Skip to content
TPA Ventures

Academic domain

Reading Comprehension IEP goals

Reading comprehension goals should name the exact comprehension skill (retell, main idea, inference, citing evidence) and the text level used to measure it. Pairing a standardized measure such as Maze with a scored constructed response gives the team both a growth curve and evidence of the skill itself.

Common measurability defects

  • Writing "will improve reading comprehension" or "will comprehend grade-level text" with no observable response the student produces.
  • Measuring with chapter-test grades, which mix comprehension with vocabulary, effort and content knowledge.
  • Omitting the text level and the support conditions (read aloud, read independently, graphic organizer), so mastery means different things on different days.
  1. 01Grades K-2Speech/LanguageCCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.1.2

    Baseline

    In 1st grade, after listening to a 1st-grade picture book, retells 2 of 6 story elements (character, setting, problem, two key events, resolution) on a story-grammar retell checklist, averaged across 4 trials.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], after reading or listening to an unfamiliar 1st-grade-level story, the student will orally retell the story including at least 5 of 6 story elements in sequence, with no more than one visual prompt, on 4 of 5 consecutive weekly trials.

    Measured by: Weekly story retell scored on a 6-element story-grammar checklist by the SLP or special education teacher, using unfamiliar leveled texts. Results graphed and reported each grading period.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will retell 3 of 6 story elements with up to two visual prompts on 3 of 5 weekly trials.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will retell 4 of 6 story elements in sequence with up to two visual prompts on 3 of 5 weekly trials.
    3. By the end of the third grading period, the student will retell 5 of 6 story elements with one visual prompt on 3 of 5 weekly trials.
  2. 02Grades K-2SLDCCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.2.2

    Baseline

    In 2nd grade, after reading a 2nd-grade informational passage aloud with teacher support for unknown words, identifies the main topic of the text in 3 of 10 trials and the focus of a specific paragraph in 2 of 10 trials.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], after reading an unfamiliar 2nd-grade multiparagraph informational text, the student will state the main topic of the whole text and the focus of 2 named paragraphs, earning at least 8 of 10 points on a main-idea scoring guide across 3 consecutive biweekly probes.

    Measured by: Biweekly main-idea probes using unfamiliar leveled informational passages, scored on a 10-point guide (4 points whole-text topic, 3 points per paragraph). easyCBM Multiple Choice Reading Comprehension administered each grading period as a secondary measure.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will score 5 of 10 points on 2 of 3 consecutive biweekly probes.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will score 6 of 10 points on 2 of 3 consecutive biweekly probes.
    3. By the end of the third grading period, the student will score 7 of 10 points on 2 of 3 consecutive biweekly probes.
  3. 03Grades 3-5SLDCCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.4.2

    Baseline

    In 4th grade, earns an adjusted score of 7 on 4th-grade DIBELS 8 Maze (median of 3). Written summaries of 4th-grade informational paragraphs score 1 of 4 on a summary rubric: restates details but does not state a main idea.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], given an unfamiliar 4th-grade informational passage, the student will write a summary that states the main idea and 2 supporting key details, scoring at least 3 of 4 on the summary rubric on 4 of 5 consecutive biweekly probes, and will earn an adjusted Maze score of at least 15.

    Measured by: Biweekly written summary probes scored on a 4-point rubric by the special education teacher, with 20% double-scored by the general education teacher. DIBELS 8 Maze administered monthly. Both graphed and reported each grading period.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will score 2 of 4 on the summary rubric on 3 of 5 probes and earn an adjusted Maze score of 9.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will score 2 of 4 on 5 consecutive probes and earn an adjusted Maze score of 11.
    3. By the end of the third grading period, the student will score 3 of 4 on 3 of 5 probes and earn an adjusted Maze score of 13.
  4. 04Grades 3-5AutismCCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.5.1

    Baseline

    In 5th grade, answers literal questions about 5th-grade fiction with 85% accuracy but answers inferential questions about character feelings and motives with 30% accuracy (6 of 20) across 4 probes, and rarely cites text.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], after reading an unfamiliar 5th-grade fiction passage, the student will answer inferential questions about character feelings, motives and actions and quote or point to a supporting sentence for each, with at least 80% accuracy (8 of 10 questions with correct evidence) on 3 consecutive biweekly probes.

    Measured by: Biweekly 10-question inferential comprehension probes on unfamiliar 5th-grade passages; an answer counts as correct only if the inference and the cited sentence both match the answer key. Scored by the special education teacher and graphed.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will answer inferential questions with 50% accuracy, using a feelings-and-clues graphic organizer, on 2 of 3 probes.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will answer inferential questions with cited evidence at 65% accuracy on 2 of 3 probes.
    3. By the end of the third grading period, the student will answer inferential questions with cited evidence at 75% accuracy without the organizer on 2 of 3 probes.
  5. 05Grades 6-8OHICCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.8.1

    Baseline

    In 8th grade, constructed responses to 8th-grade informational articles score 1.5 of 4 on average on a text-evidence rubric across 4 assignments: makes a claim but cites no evidence or cites evidence that does not support the claim.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], after reading an unfamiliar 8th-grade informational article, the student will write a constructed response that answers the question and cites at least 2 pieces of relevant textual evidence with an explanation, scoring 3 or higher on the 4-point text-evidence rubric on 4 of 5 consecutive biweekly probes.

    Measured by: Biweekly constructed-response probes on unfamiliar 8th-grade articles, scored on the district 4-point text-evidence rubric by the ELA teacher and special education co-teacher, with agreement checked on 1 in 4 responses. Graphed and reported each grading period.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will score 2 of 4 on the rubric on 3 of 5 consecutive probes using a claim-evidence-reasoning organizer.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will score 2.5 of 4 on average across 5 consecutive probes, citing at least one relevant piece of evidence each time.
    3. By the end of the third grading period, the student will score 3 of 4 on 3 of 5 consecutive probes.
  6. 06Grades 9-12EDCCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.9-10.2

    Baseline

    In 10th grade, written summaries of 9th- to 10th-grade informational texts score 1 of 4 on a central-idea rubric across 3 samples: lists opinions and isolated details without identifying the central idea. Completes 2 of 5 assigned reading responses.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], after reading an unfamiliar grade-level informational text of 600 to 900 words, the student will write an objective summary that states the central idea and explains how 2 specific details develop it, scoring 3 or higher on the 4-point central-idea rubric on 4 of 5 consecutive biweekly probes.

    Measured by: Biweekly summary probes using unfamiliar texts from the 10th-grade curriculum, scored on a 4-point rubric by the special education teacher, with 25% double-scored by the English teacher. Graphed and reported each grading period.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will complete 5 of 5 summary probes and score 2 of 4 on 3 of them.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will score 2 or higher on 5 consecutive probes and state the central idea in an objective sentence.
    3. By the end of the third grading period, the student will score 3 of 4 on 3 of 5 consecutive probes.

Draft goals like these from your own students' data.

TPA Ventures writes measurable, standards-aligned goals from evaluation scores and classroom probes in minutes.