Skip to content
TPA Ventures

Functional domain

Articulation IEP goals

Articulation goals name the target sound, the word position and the linguistic level (word, phrase, sentence, conversation) at which accuracy is measured. A strong goal moves the student from structured drill to spontaneous speech, because a sound produced correctly only in the therapy room has not yet changed how the student communicates.

Common measurability defects

  • Writing "will improve articulation" or "will be intelligible" without naming the sound, word position or level of complexity.
  • Measuring accuracy only in structured drill with immediate models, so the goal never captures carryover into classroom speech.
  • Using "90% accuracy" with no number of trials or sessions, which lets a single good day count as mastery.
  1. 01Grades K-2Speech/Language

    Baseline

    In kindergarten, GFTA-3 Sounds-in-Words standard score of 72. Fronts velars: produces /k/ correctly in 4 of 20 initial-position word trials (20%) and /g/ in 2 of 20 (10%). Unfamiliar listeners understand about 60% of connected speech.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], during structured play and picture description, the student will produce /k/ and /g/ correctly in initial, medial and final positions of words within phrases with at least 90% accuracy across 50 opportunities per session for 3 consecutive sessions.

    Measured by: SLP records accuracy on 50 elicited productions per session (25 per sound across positions) and graphs the results. A 3-minute conversational probe is scored monthly. Progress reported each grading period.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will produce /k/ and /g/ in initial position of single words with 80% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will produce /k/ and /g/ in all word positions with 80% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions.
    3. By the end of the third grading period, the student will produce /k/ and /g/ in all positions within carrier phrases with 85% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions.
  2. 02Grades K-2Speech/Language

    Baseline

    In 2nd grade, produces /s/ and /z/ with an interdental distortion. Correct /s/ in 6 of 30 word-level trials (20%) and 0% in sentences. GFTA-3 Sounds-in-Words standard score of 78.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], when reading or formulating sentences, the student will produce /s/ and /s/-blends correctly in all word positions with at least 90% accuracy on 30 trials per session across 3 consecutive sessions.

    Measured by: SLP records 30 sentence-level trials per session on a data sheet and graphs accuracy. A classroom carryover probe of 20 spontaneous /s/ words is collected each grading period. Progress reported each grading period.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will produce /s/ in all word positions in single words with 80% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will produce /s/ and /s/-blends in phrases with 80% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions.
    3. By the end of the third grading period, the student will produce /s/ and /s/-blends in sentences with 85% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions.
  3. 03Grades 3-5Speech/Language

    Baseline

    In 3rd grade, produces prevocalic /r/ correctly in 3 of 30 word-level trials (10%) and vocalic /r/ (er, ar, or) in 0 of 30. Stimulable for /r/ in isolation with a tongue-tip-up cue in 5 of 10 attempts.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], during structured sentence production tasks, the student will produce prevocalic and vocalic /r/ correctly in all word positions with at least 85% accuracy on 40 trials per session across 3 consecutive sessions.

    Measured by: SLP records 40 trials per session (20 prevocalic, 20 vocalic) and graphs accuracy by context. A 3-minute conversational sample is scored each grading period. Progress reported each grading period.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will produce /r/ in isolation and syllables with 80% accuracy given a verbal cue across 3 consecutive sessions.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will produce prevocalic /r/ in single words with 80% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions.
    3. By the end of the third grading period, the student will produce prevocalic and vocalic /r/ in phrases with 80% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions.
  4. 04Grades 3-5Speech/Language

    Baseline

    In 5th grade, produces /r/ in all positions at 92% accuracy in structured sentences in therapy, but at 45% accuracy in a 5-minute classroom conversation sample. Self-corrects 1 in 10 errors.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], during unstructured classroom conversation and small-group discussion, the student will produce /r/ correctly in at least 90% of opportunities across 3 consecutive monthly 5-minute samples, and will self-correct at least 75% of /r/ errors.

    Measured by: Monthly 5-minute conversation samples recorded in the classroom by the SLP or general education teacher, transcribed and scored for /r/ accuracy and self-corrections. Results graphed and reported each grading period.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will produce /r/ with 70% accuracy in a 5-minute structured conversation in therapy and self-correct 40% of errors.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will produce /r/ with 80% accuracy in a 5-minute classroom sample and self-correct 60% of errors.
  5. 05Grades 6-8Speech/Language

    Baseline

    In 6th grade, has a residual lateral /s/ and /z/ distortion. Correct /s/ in 18 of 30 sentence-level trials (60%) and about 30% in conversation. Reports avoiding speaking in class because of the sound.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], during an oral presentation or classroom discussion of at least 3 minutes, the student will produce /s/ and /z/ correctly in at least 90% of opportunities on 3 consecutive monthly samples, using a self-monitoring tally to check productions.

    Measured by: Monthly recorded 3-minute classroom speaking samples scored by the SLP for /s/ and /z/ accuracy, with the student's self-monitoring tally compared to the SLP's for agreement. Weekly therapy data on 40 sentence-level trials. Progress reported each grading period.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will produce /s/ and /z/ in sentences with 85% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will produce /s/ and /z/ with 80% accuracy in a 3-minute therapy conversation, with self-monitoring agreement of 80%.
    3. By the end of the third grading period, the student will produce /s/ and /z/ with 85% accuracy in a recorded classroom sample.
  6. 06Grades 9-12Multiple

    Baseline

    In 9th grade, has spastic dysarthria associated with cerebral palsy. Unfamiliar listeners transcribe 45% of words correctly in 10 recorded sentences. Speaks at a fast rate without pausing between phrases.

    Annual goal

    By [annual review date], when reading or formulating 10 functional sentences (ordering food, asking directions, giving personal information), the student will use a reduced speaking rate, phrase breaks and exaggerated articulation so that unfamiliar listeners correctly transcribe at least 75% of words on 3 consecutive monthly probes.

    Measured by: Monthly intelligibility probe: 10 recorded sentences transcribed by 2 unfamiliar adult listeners, scored as percent of words correctly identified, averaged across listeners. SLP records strategy use each session. Progress reported each grading period.

    Short-term objectives

    1. By the end of the first grading period, the student will use pacing-board phrase breaks in 8 of 10 sentences and reach 55% listener intelligibility.
    2. By the end of the second grading period, the student will use reduced rate and phrase breaks without the pacing board in 8 of 10 sentences and reach 63% intelligibility.
    3. By the end of the third grading period, the student will reach 70% intelligibility on 2 consecutive monthly probes.

Draft goals like these from your own students' data.

TPA Ventures writes measurable, standards-aligned goals from evaluation scores and classroom probes in minutes.